Motion to reconsider an immigration order

Reconsideration must identify a specific legal or factual error in the prior decision—not rebuild the case with new evidence.

A motion to reconsider asks an Immigration Judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals to reexamine a ruling because the decision contains an error of law or fact, or because a relevant change in law affects the result. It is decided on the existing record and is governed by strict filing, jurisdiction, and deadline rules.

Request a case assessment
Immigration decision and legal authorities organized for a motion to reconsider
The decision, existing record, controlling law, deadline, jurisdiction, and stay question must be reviewed together.

Determine whether reconsideration is the correct procedure

  • Did an Immigration Judge or the BIA issue the controlling decision, and who now has jurisdiction?
  • What precise legal or factual error appears in the decision and where is it preserved in the record?
  • Is the filing within the generally applicable 30-day deadline and the one-motion limit?
  • Would an appeal, motion to reopen, motion to remand, or separate stay request address the problem more accurately?

Anchor every argument in the decision and record

  • Obtain the written or oral decision, hearing record, filings, exhibits, prior briefs, and proof of service.
  • Identify each disputed holding and cite the corresponding record pages, statute, regulation, and controlling precedent.
  • Explain how the identified error affected the disposition rather than merely repeating arguments already rejected.
  • Confirm jurisdiction, filing method, fee or fee-waiver requirements, service, deadline, and whether separate appellate or stay action is required.
01

The existing record controls

Reconsideration is directed at an error of law or fact in the prior ruling, or a relevant change in law. The motion must state the claimed error with particularity and support it with citations to legal authority and the existing record. It is not the correct vehicle for presenting new facts or evidence.

If the case depends on newly available evidence, changed country conditions, a vacated conviction, or facts that were not previously in the record, a motion to reopen may be the appropriate procedure. When an appeal is already pending, a filing directed to the BIA may instead be treated under the rules governing remand.

02

Deadline, number limit, and forum are decisive

For both Immigration Judge and BIA decisions, the general rule is that a motion to reconsider must be filed within 30 days and that a party may file only one such motion. EOIR states that an individual generally has no regulatory exception to these time and number limits, subject to any exception created by statute, published case law, regulation, or another applicable legal rule.

The proper forum follows the procedural posture. After an appeal has been filed with the BIA, the Immigration Judge no longer has jurisdiction over the case. A motion filed with the wrong tribunal, or one that reaches the court after the deadline, can fail without consideration of the underlying argument.

03

Protect parallel deadlines and enforcement risk

Filing a motion to reconsider before the appeal deadline does not stay or extend the time to appeal. Counsel must therefore evaluate whether an appeal and a motion are both implicated, what each filing can accomplish, and how to avoid forfeiting review while one request remains pending.

A motion to reconsider also does not automatically stay a removal or deportation order. Stay protection requires separate analysis and may require a distinct request. Granting reconsideration means the tribunal will reexamine its ruling; it does not guarantee a favorable ultimate result.

Facts and procedure determine the route.

A disagreement with the result is not enough. The motion must identify a reviewable error with precision, use the correct procedural vehicle, reach the tribunal with jurisdiction on time, and preserve any separate appeal or stay issue.

Official reference: EOIR Policy Manual — Motions to Reconsider

Issues to resolve before filing.

What does a motion to reconsider argue?

It identifies a specific error of law or fact in the prior decision, or a relevant change in law, using the existing record.

What is the usual deadline?

The general EOIR rule is 30 days after the Immigration Judge’s final administrative order or the BIA’s decision.

Can new evidence be submitted?

Reconsideration is based on the existing record. A motion to reopen is generally the vehicle for material new facts or evidence.

Does it extend the appeal deadline?

No. Filing a motion to reconsider does not stay or extend the deadline for an appeal.

Does filing stop removal?

Generally no. A separate stay analysis and, where available, a separate stay request may be required.

Where is the motion filed?

It depends on which tribunal issued the controlling decision and whether an appeal is pending. Jurisdiction must be confirmed from the procedural record.

Describe your situation and the decision you need to make.

For an initial inquiry, briefly describe:

  • The type of proceeding or protection issue and whether a case is already pending.
  • Any hearing notice, government decision, or prior filing relevant to the issue.
  • The next hearing or response date and whether the person is currently detained.

A short summary is enough. Send no passport numbers or confidential documents.

Initial contact does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case acceptance follows conflict and scope review.